Rod Satterwhite and David Greenspan are members of the Labor & Employment group at McGuireWoods LLP. Both handle employment litigation on behalf of employers, and advise companies on employment issues regularly.

Friday, October 07, 2005 - Posts

Knight Riders

Apparently there is a lot more to being a medieval knight than riding around in polished armor to the adulation of a crowd, battling the occasional wizard and being waited on by serfs and wenches (not my term, folks).  You have to take more than your fair share of lumps as well.  In a case widely reported in the Chicago area, several former knights (late knights?) of the Medieval Times restaurant chain are suing for retaliation after they were fired when they filed workers compensation claims.  For the uninitiated, a Medieval Times show involves full-speed horseback riding in armor, jousting with mock-up wood lances (that appear to break fairly easily), and orchestrated fights using passable replicas of broadswords.  As befits an entertainment venue involving mounted combat, there's a fair amount of action involving people falling off horses, which is apparently where most of the serious injuries alleged in the lawsuit occurred.  The allegations of the complaint revolve around a memo allegedly sent out about the company's concern with increasing costs of workers compensation claims.  Allegedly the memo caused Medieval Times managers to threaten employees with termination if they filed workers compensation claims for their injuries.  The plaintiffs indicate this is exactly what happened to them.  The company, of course, denies what would be a clear violation of state law, so this might go all the way through to litigation after all.  But it does seem that a company putting on these kinds of shows would expect a lot of long-term injury claims given the physical demands on the employees.  We'll update this case as it develops, if for no other reason than it gives us the opportunity for lots of bad puns and double entendre remarks.

Coming to a Big Brother Near You

On June 6, 2005, the Department of Justice put a notice in the Federal Register asking for comments on a proposal to allow employers to access FBI databases for applicant screening and other job-related purposes.  Although DoJ's effort is part of a wider, Congressionally-authorized program to standardize existing background checks required by statute, the prospect of employers using federal criminal databases as part of their business operation raises a vision of the corporate state that I hoped was some time away. 
 
In truth, of course, employers use criminal databases for background checks all the time.  These are typically done at a local level through state databases of arrest and conviction records.  Some FBI arrest and conviction records are available through state agencies, but not to employers directly.  Having some familiarity with criminal databases from my previous work as a prosecutor, I have real concerns about over-all accuracy and scope of the information available.  Moreover, these records typically contain information that could taint any hiring decision, such as arrest records, which are not supposed to be considered in any way under federal or some state anti-discrimination laws.  How much of this information should be disclosed, in what form it should be disclosed (it takes some familiarity or experience to evaluate FBI records), and how much privacy people give up when they apply for work are all issues that I hope get wrung out before this program moves forward.